Supreme Court

Washington – Supreme Court On Tuesday, the Richard Glossip’s inmates were sentenced to punishment in Oklaho because of the important witness in the court and the prosecutor to suspend information about him.

The decision which is a rare victory for inmates around the conservative court means whether the prosecutor must decide whether to put in the trial again or not. The conservative sentence Neil Gorsuch does not participate.

The liberal judge Sonia Sotomayor wrote to the court that the prosecution “Violation of obligations under the constitution in the amendment of false words” as a result, “Glossip has the right to have a new experiment”. She wrote.

Glossip, 62– Was decided to manage the murder in 1997 of his boss at Oklaho Maziti Motel that they worked.

He has been in the execution line since 1998 and had to face the execution of many times.

“We would like to thank the majority of the court that was clearly supported. Previously, the prosecutor was unable to hide the important evidence from the lawyer and could not stand while their witnesses lied to the jury.

Glossip’s latest appeal was very supportive when the Attorney General of the Republican Gentner Drummond agreed that the confidence was unstable and asked the court to decide his favor.

The confidence rely on the testimony of the major witnesses, Jasin Sot, whose murder in 1997, the confession and avoided the death penalty as Glossip hired him to kill the owner of the Barry Van Trese hotel.

The appeal of the claims that the prosecutor suspended the Sot and he gave false words in the prosecutor’s consideration, but did not reveal the Glossip’s second experiment in 2004 that Sneeed was diagnosed. With two polar disease and prescribing lithium after arresting him

Sneeed was a witness like never before that he had never seen a psychiatrist.

After the investigation, Drummond concluded that because Glossip’s confidence has rested significantly to Sneeed’s credibility, it should not be sustainable.

The state stopped agreeing with the claims of Glossip as innocent.

In her opinion, Sotomayor agreed with Drummond, writing that the prosecutor. “Know that Sneeed’s words are false.” When he was a witness

“Because the testimony of the mechanic is a direct evidence regarding the offense of the scholarship of the alternate switching, the credibility of the Sneeed Jury’s loa, it is necessary to determine here,” she added.

The prosecutor should fix the record. But if they do so, it will destroy the reliable SOTOMAYOR’s credibility of Sneeed.

“Therefore, there is a reasonable possibility that the correction of the schedule of the mechanic will affect the jury’s decision,” she added.

The Supreme Court has a majority of 6-3 conservatives who rarely intervene to prevent executions from operations. But sometimes stepping in when there is a clear abortion of justice

Despite the discovery of Drummond, the Court of Appeal Oklaho Hold the death penalty Last year and the Committee for forgiveness and punishment of the state vote Glossip allowance permission

The original prosecutor who works on this case, Connie Smothermon and Gary ACKley argued with Drummond’s accounts and said they were not consulted during the investigation.

They wrote a letter asking about the new discoveries. Adjacent to the Amicus conclusion Submitted by Van Trese’s relatives who called for the Glossip’s confidence.

“The family is still confident that when a new trial, the jury will return to judge the decision, as in the first two experiments: the first murder,” said Paul Castle, the lawyer of the Van Trese family. In a statement

Previously, the Supreme Court has signal the interest in the Glossip case in May 2023 by Come in To prevent him from being executed The court also blocked the operation of the Glossip in 2015 in a separate prosecution regarding the serious injection process of the state.

Two conservative judges, Chief Justice Thomas and Judge Samuel Elito said they will rule Glossip.

Another judge, Amy Kodie Barrett, said that she agreed with the majority of Soto Myer. But will send the case back to the Oklaho court instead of completely abandoning confidence

The Supreme Court wrote in disagreement “lack of power” to replace the decisions of the government and officials just because the Attorney General changed the position.

“Instead of the law that is prolonged every time” in order to rule the Glossip’s favor.